The statement engages in public discourse by discussing U.S. immigration policy, specifically the criteria for visa eligibility and the implications for foreign talent. It suggests that only exceptionally talented individuals should qualify for certain visas, which is a substantive engagement with public policy.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies a restrictive view on immigration that could be seen as dismissive of the contributions of non-exceptional immigrants. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be interpreted as lacking respect for the dignity of immigrants who do not meet the 'exceptional' standard. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards immigrants who may not be considered 'exceptional.' [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not foster constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express an opinion on immigration policy, but it could be more responsible by considering the broader implications of such a restrictive view.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.