The statement questions media coverage of the costs associated with illegal immigration, suggesting a perceived bias or oversight. It raises a public issue regarding immigration and media responsibility.
- The statement does not directly harm but could contribute to divisive discourse if not handled carefully.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in direct harassment but could be seen as indirectly stigmatizing immigrants. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on costs and potential negative impacts. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It raises a critical question but does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.