Reposted by J.K. Rowling
Defend Our Juries
@DefendourJuries
·
132d
The statement and letter address public safety concerns following a terrorist attack and the impact on police resources due to a planned protest. The police request to postpone the protest is based on the need to allocate officers to community safety. The response from 'Defend our Juries' suggests a refusal to comply, emphasizing their right to protest.
- The statement aims to prioritize public safety, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The letter respects the privacy and dignity of communities by focusing on safety without targeting specific groups negatively. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The police engage in constructive dialogue by explaining their reasoning and inviting further discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote public safety and community protection. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.