JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
10/3/2025, 6:42:33 PM
X
In reply to:
NannyDD
@DianeCroft1966
·
131d
@jk_rowling @Billyjensen What a rude and ignorant response. Women's rights are being taken away in the US and you clearly do not give one rat's ass about those women. Only your obsession with trans women. You aren't protecting women, you're helping the patriarchy with your nonsense.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
131d
@Billyjensen ‘Fighting fascism.’ It must be so hard in the trenches, knee deep in mud, bullets flying all around you. It’s great you still find time to tweet, though.
Billy Jensen
@Billyjensen
·
131d
@jk_rowling Can you put the same energy towards fighting fascism? We are having a bit of a moment over here.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
132d
Strange, I know, but I find myself completely untroubled by the fact that total strangers don't understand why I think women's rights are worth defending.

The statement dismisses the previous comment as a parody, indicating a refusal to engage seriously with the criticism. This response can be seen as dismissive and potentially undermines constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the previous comment, which could be seen as undermining serious discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, as it dismisses the previous comment without engaging with its content. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead dismisses the previous comment as a parody. [-1]