JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
10/3/2025, 8:06:52 PM
X
In reply to:
StormLadyHarmsDepp🏴‍☠️🦜🐒☠️
@yvette_harms
·
131d
@Billyjensen @jk_rowling @stowleopard The nerve of yet another man to call her by her first name without even asking if that is okay. Typical narcissistic fascist
Billy Jensen
@Billyjensen
·
131d
@jk_rowling @stowleopard Wasn't born yet for the Blitz, Jo. My grandfather however, did come over and fight to preserve your country's freedom against (checks notes) fascism.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
131d
@stowleopard @Billyjensen Well, thank God Billy Jensen's over there tweeting about baseball. If only we'd had him during the Blitz.
Peter Stow
@stowleopard
·
131d
@jk_rowling @Billyjensen There is no excuse for you to be ignorant about what is going on in America at the moment. It is fascism and it’s very scary. It’s not the only country where fascism is emerging. A major concern for all of us.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
131d
@Billyjensen ‘Fighting fascism.’ It must be so hard in the trenches, knee deep in mud, bullets flying all around you. It’s great you still find time to tweet, though.
Billy Jensen
@Billyjensen
·
131d
@jk_rowling Can you put the same energy towards fighting fascism? We are having a bit of a moment over here.

The statement by @yvette_harms addresses a public issue related to respect and gender dynamics, particularly in the context of online interactions. It critiques Billy Jensen's behavior towards women, suggesting a lack of respect. The tone is accusatory and critical, focusing on personal behavior rather than broader societal issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it directly accuses Billy Jensen of struggling to show women respect, which could be seen as harmful or defamatory. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of Billy Jensen, as it publicly criticizes his behavior without constructive engagement. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a personal attack rather than fostering understanding or discussion. [-1]