The statement and image present a partisan comparison between Republican and Democrat proposals regarding government funding. The language used, such as 'Nonpartisan Clean CR' versus 'Democrats Dirty CR,' suggests a biased perspective. The intent appears to be to criticize the Democratic proposal while favorably presenting the Republican one.
- The statement uses charged language that may contribute to divisiveness rather than constructive dialogue, potentially causing harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The language used could be seen as disrespectful and not conducive to a respectful discourse. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the complexity of the issue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism but rather uses derogatory language, which could be seen as a personal attack on the opposing party. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.