The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of the 'Twitter leaks' and their impact on government agencies, suggesting a critique of governmental actions and transparency. It raises concerns about the influence of government agencies on social media and the potential targeting of individuals, which are significant public issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of government actions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on government actions rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it raises awareness of potential governmental overreach.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of government agencies, which is constructive in nature, but it does not engage in dialogue with opposing views.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing governmental transparency and accountability, using the platform to raise awareness of public issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.