Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement is a critical commentary on the Trump administration's peace plan, suggesting it is a facade for ethnic cleansing rather than a genuine effort for peace. It uses strong language to express opposition and calls for global resistance. The accompanying conversation and image further contextualize the statement within a broader critique of historical and ongoing political actions by Israel and the US.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of those involved, using terms like 'ethnic cleansing' which are highly charged and accusatory. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the complexities of the issue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on condemnation rather than proposing solutions. [-1]