JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
10/9/2025, 6:02:46 PM
X
In reply to:
Democratic Kampuchea!
@MindVsMyth
·
123d
@LancsNobby @AllianceLGB @jk_rowling What is a woman?
Nobby
@LancsNobby
·
123d
@MindVsMyth @AllianceLGB @jk_rowling Lesbianism is same sex attraction. It therefore by definition excludes men, however they identify. It’s not hard to understand. Maybe though by virtue signalling wankers like you.
Democratic Kampuchea!
@MindVsMyth
·
123d
@AllianceLGB @jk_rowling This is transphobic because it defines womanhood by birth anatomy, denying trans women’s lived reality. Lesbian identity is social, not strictly biological. Excluding trans lesbians repeats patriarchal and homophobic logic, policing gender to divide queer solidarity and maintain
LGB Alliance
@AllianceLGB
·
123d
We are disgusted by straight men calling themselves “lesbians”. We are even more disgusted by an “LGBTIQA+” group in a political party telling us - on “International Lesbian Day” - that we have to accept it.
Why not tell the Green Party what you think of this rank homophobia?
LGBTIQA+ Greens
@lgbtiqa_greens
·
124d
It's International #LesbianDay (8th October) and we hope that if you're a lesbian you're having a great day. Trans lesbians are lesbians. No amount of shouting about that from anyone can change that.

The statement engages in a public discourse about the definition of womanhood and lesbian identity, touching on biological and social perspectives. It presents a biological definition of a woman, which can be seen as excluding trans women, thus potentially contributing to a divisive debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by excluding trans women from the definition of womanhood, which can be seen as invalidating their identity. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of trans individuals by defining womanhood strictly biologically, potentially engaging in exclusionary rhetoric. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards trans individuals, as it adheres to a strict biological perspective. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage constructively with opposing views, instead reinforcing a binary perspective on gender. [-1]