Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement addresses a sensitive and complex geopolitical issue involving prisoner exchanges between Hamas and Israel. It uses charged language, referring to Palestinian prisoners as 'hostages,' which implies a particular stance on the issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially do harm by using charged language that may inflame tensions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the language used could be seen as disrespectful to the parties involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses language that may polarize rather than foster dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the complexity of the issue. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or conducive to constructive public discourse. [-1]