Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a potential geopolitical outcome related to U.S. foreign policy and military actions, specifically referencing President Trump's decision to order the killing of Qasem Soleimani. It engages with public issues concerning international relations and military strategy, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as glorifying military action, which may indirectly contribute to harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it frames a complex geopolitical situation in terms of victory and military success. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive dialogue with those who may disagree with the military action.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to express an opinion on a public issue, but it could be more responsible by acknowledging the complexities and potential consequences of military actions.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.