The Washington Post
@washingtonpost
·
31d
The statement is a critical commentary on the actions of former President Trump regarding a government shutdown and its impact on federal employees. It accuses Trump of using the shutdown to harm federal workers and their families, suggesting that the cruelty of these actions is intentional.
- The statement accuses Trump of causing harm to federal employees, which could be seen as a violation of the principle to strive to do no harm. However, the statement itself does not directly cause harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is critical of Trump's actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and critical in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a direct accusation without offering a platform for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to criticize a public figure's actions, which could be seen as an attempt to hold them accountable, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech by criticizing a public figure's actions, using the platform to express a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.