The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the societal implications of technology, specifically the balance between enhancing and supplanting human experience. It suggests a nuanced view on technological advancement, promoting a thoughtful consideration of its impact on humanity.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for a balanced approach to technology. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by distinguishing between beneficial and potentially harmful technological advancements. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding thoughtfully to concerns about technology. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.