In reply to:
David Sinclair
@davidasinclair
·
27d
The statement is part of a conversation discussing the implications of technological advancements on human lifespan and the ethical considerations of choosing when to die. This is a substantive engagement with public issues related to human rights and bioethics, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm directly, but the topic itself is sensitive and requires careful handling to avoid potential harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage with a complex ethical issue that could benefit from such an approach.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is an agreement and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages with a topic relevant to free speech and uses the platform to discuss a significant societal issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.