In reply to:
scorchedearth2025
@orignalSwagmire
·
117d
The statement is part of a discussion on the constitutionality of racial gerrymandering, a significant public issue. The tone is speculative, predicting a Supreme Court decision outcome. It lacks substantive engagement with the issue itself, focusing instead on the potential vote split.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but lacks depth in addressing the issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on the outcome rather than the implications of the decision. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide reasoning for the prediction. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.