Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement 'Right on schedule' is a response to a conversation about Israel's actions regarding a ceasefire and humanitarian aid. It implies a critique of Israel's behavior, suggesting predictability in their actions to undermine the ceasefire. The tone is critical and possibly sarcastic, indicating disapproval of the situation described by Ryan Grim.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of Israel's actions, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a nation's actions.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critique. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a brief, sarcastic remark without further explanation or engagement. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to critique a public issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the critique are questionable due to its brevity and lack of context.