Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on a military action allegedly ordered by Trump, describing it as extrajudicial murder and part of a war plan against Venezuela. It uses strong language to condemn the action and implies a violation of international law.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, but it aims to highlight perceived injustices. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses a public figure of illegal actions, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding of the situation by highlighting potential legal and ethical issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a public figure's actions, but it could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.