The statement critiques the influence of corporate media and calls for breaking up media conglomerates while opposing Department of Defense censorship. It engages with public issues related to media freedom and government influence, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language to express frustration with corporate media.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses aggressive language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone without addressing specific arguments or solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for media reform, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by opposing censorship but could use a more responsible tone. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.