Justin Batt

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score -10

The statement expresses frustration with Chase's handling of a wire transfer, mentioning the use of Palantir and comparing it to a past experience with Wells Fargo. It highlights concerns about privacy and customer service, but does not engage in broader public discourse about these issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement expresses personal dissatisfaction but does not appear to cause harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The mention of Palantir and questioning Chase's actions could imply privacy concerns, but it does not engage in harassment or hate speech.