The statement expresses a strong opinion against the idea of a UN-imposed tax, drawing a historical parallel to the American Revolution. It suggests defunding the UN, indicating a critical stance on its role and actions.
- The statement uses strong language but does not directly harm others.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It lacks empathy or understanding towards the UN's potential motives for taxation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is critical but does not engage in personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to advocate for a specific political stance.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.