Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement is a critical commentary on U.S. foreign aid and military support, particularly in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It implies that U.S. financial support is given to Israel despite allegations of human rights violations, using hyperbolic language to emphasize perceived injustices in foreign policy priorities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses provocative language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly the use of the term 'genocide.' [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be interpreted as disrespectful or accusatory towards certain groups, potentially contributing to divisive discourse. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses charged language that may polarize rather than foster dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses hyperbole and lacks a nuanced discussion of the issues. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or constructive. [-1]