The statement and image engage in public discourse by addressing the impact of political decisions on science and innovation. It contrasts the effects of a government shutdown on scientific progress, attributing blame to a specific political party.
- The statement uses a partisan tone, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but the partisan language may not fully respect the dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote empathy or compassion, focusing instead on political blame. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it uses a partisan approach rather than fostering discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.