In reply to:
The statement criticizes the local government for allowing a BLM mural, linking it to business closures, and calls for restitution. It engages in public discourse by addressing civic issues and government actions.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by attributing business closures to a mural, which may not be a direct cause. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those involved by labeling the government as a 'fraud.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards the intentions behind the mural. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage constructively, instead making accusatory claims without evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.