Mike Johnson

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -102
The White House
@WhiteHouse
·
46d
There’s ZERO excuse for Democrats to torpedo this common sense, clean Continuing Resolution and plunge the government into a reckless shutdown.

IN FACT, they’ve backed this move thirteen times before. Talk about hypocrisy. 🤨
10/17/2025, 7:43:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
29d
#6: GEORGIA – 65,000 Active-Duty Servicemembers:

@SenOssoff and @SenatorWarnock have voted 10 times against troop pay — even as servicemembers in Georgia line up at food pantries.
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
36d
The line at this food bank is filled with military families who have no idea when they'll get their next paycheck — all because of Chuck Schumer and Democrats.

Democrats should be ashamed of themselves, but that'd require them to have shame in the first place. Pathetic cowards.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
29d
#2: VIRGINIA – 119,000 Active-Duty Servicemembers:

@SenTimKaine and @MarkWarner are blocking pay for nearly 120,000 men and women in uniform — and another 150,000 federal civilian employees across Virginia.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
29d
#1: CALIFORNIA – 157,000 Active-Duty Servicemembers:

@SenAdamSchiff and @SenAlexPadilla are demanding we restore billions in taxpayer-funded benefits to illegal aliens instead of paying the nearly 160,000 troops in their state.
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
29d
Of the TEN states with the largest active-duty military populations, SIX are represented by two Democrat Senators who are repeatedly voting to withhold their pay. 🧵

The statement is part of a broader political discourse concerning government shutdowns and their impact on military pay. It criticizes specific senators for their voting records, suggesting they are blocking pay for servicemembers. The tone is accusatory and politically charged, aiming to hold certain politicians accountable for the perceived consequences of their actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by attributing blame without full context, potentially misleading the public. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of the individuals it criticizes, using a confrontational tone. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on blame rather than solutions. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against specific political figures, but not necessarily for societal betterment. [-1]