Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement highlights a perceived irony in John Bolton's situation, contrasting his past calls for severe punishment under the Espionage Act with his own legal troubles. The tone is critical and possibly sarcastic, aiming to point out a double standard.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by potentially inciting negative sentiment against Bolton, though it does not directly call for harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but may challenge dignity by highlighting alleged hypocrisy. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.