Reposted by Gavin Newsom
The statement criticizes a military demonstration involving live munitions, suggesting it was dangerous and irresponsible. It implies negligence by the White House and highlights potential harm to civilians. The tone is critical and concerned about public safety.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm from the demonstration, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but criticizes public figures and actions, which is within the bounds of public discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of public actions and decisions, focusing on safety concerns rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.