-8
The statement is highly critical and uses strong language to equate a ceasefire with genocide, suggesting a normalization of violence by Israel. It reflects a tone of condemnation and frustration.
- The statement could be seen as harmful due to its inflammatory language, potentially escalating tensions.Ā [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those involved, using charged language that could be considered as contributing to hate speech.Ā [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead using provocative language that may deepen divisions.Ā [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for a harsh critique without offering solutions or engaging in a balanced discussion.Ā [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.