Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement criticizes a proposal by Trump, labeling it as an extension of Israel's occupation and a financial scheme for the Trump family. It engages in public discourse by addressing the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a significant public issue, and critiques a political figure's actions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly the use of 'genocidal,' which is a serious accusation and could contribute to harm.Ā [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of 'genocidal' could be seen as disrespectful to those involved in the conflict.Ā [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory language without offering constructive dialogue.Ā [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong language and personal attacks against Trump and his family.Ā [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement attempts to use influence to critique a political proposal, but does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse due to its accusatory tone.Ā [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity due to its inflammatory language.Ā [-1]