Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -66

The statement is critical of Israel's actions, suggesting that the bombing was unjustified and undermines peace efforts. It uses strong language, which may incite further tension rather than promote understanding.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may contribute to harm by escalating tensions and conflict. [-2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The language used does not promote understanding or empathy, potentially increasing division. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on Israel's actions. [-1]