Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement is a political critique aimed at the Democratic Party, accusing them of prioritizing political rallies over addressing the government shutdown's impact on families. It calls for bipartisan cooperation to reopen the government.
- The statement uses charged language that could be seen as divisive, potentially causing harm by deepening political divides. This violates the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful to the opposing party. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone and does not offer specific solutions or engage with opposing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to push a political agenda rather than for societal betterment, as it focuses on criticizing the opposition. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given its accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.