The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the use of outrage in political discussions and media. It suggests that anger and frustration are being used strategically to gain attention, which is a critique of current media practices.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting that outrage is being used manipulatively, but it does not directly cause harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but indirectly questions the integrity of individuals involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but does not offer constructive solutions or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.