The statement and accompanying letter engage in public discourse by addressing the use of gender-neutral titles in schools, a topic related to educational policy and gender identity rights. The tone is dismissive and critical of the use of 'Mx.' as a title, framing it as a violation of law and policy.
- The statement and letter may cause harm by dismissing the use of gender-neutral titles, potentially alienating individuals who identify with them. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals who prefer gender-neutral titles, potentially engaging in a form of harassment by labeling their preferences as 'nonsense.' [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding towards individuals who use gender-neutral titles, framing their identity as a threat to educational values. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using dismissive language and not acknowledging differing perspectives. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.