Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes U.S. administrations for neglecting the Leahy Law, which prohibits military aid to foreign forces involved in human rights abuses, and highlights Trump's attempt to dismantle it. It engages in public discourse by addressing U.S. foreign policy and human rights issues.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques policy decisions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By highlighting human rights concerns, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for affected populations. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of policy, not personal attacks, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about human rights and policy issues, contributing to societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing significant public issues with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.