Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a strong critique of Israel's actions in relation to international law and humanitarian aid, referencing a decision by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It uses charged language, such as 'spurious defenses' and 'mass murder,' which indicates a highly critical tone. The statement addresses significant public issues, including international law, human rights, and the role of international organizations.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices and violations of international law, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for accountability. However, the use of inflammatory language may not fully align with this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those it criticizes. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses accusatory language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses strong, accusatory language rather than facilitating dialogue or understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.