The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the process and challenges of enacting congressional term limits, a significant public policy issue. It provides insight into the legislative process and the potential role of states and Congress in amending the Constitution.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a procedural aspect of constitutional amendments. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the complexity of the amendment process and the requirement for state ratification. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a question about the constitutional process without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a public policy issue and contributing to civic dialogue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.