Reposted by Ron DeSantis
CommonSenzz
@CommonSenzz1
·
85d
The statement critiques the potential for insider trading among members of Congress, suggesting that their investment success is suspiciously high. It implies a need for legislative action to address this issue, engaging in public discourse about ethics in government and financial regulation.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies wrongdoing by members of Congress, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded. However, it raises a legitimate concern about ethics.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not naming specific individuals, but it broadly accuses members of Congress of unethical behavior, which could be seen as a form of indirect harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of potential ethical issues in government, but it does so in a way that could foster distrust rather than empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but questions the integrity of Congress members' financial activities, which could be seen as constructive criticism if backed by evidence. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a societal issue, potentially contributing to the betterment of society by advocating for transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by addressing a public concern responsibly, though it could benefit from more evidence to support its claims. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.