In reply to:
Gary Wolverton
@gary_wolverton3
·
24d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the concept of technological socialism in response to a proposal for Universal Basic Services. It contrasts technological socialism with governmental socialism, suggesting that technology can provide services for free, similar to free photography or global phone calls.
- The statement does not cause harm and presents an opinion on technological socialism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by explaining the concept of technological socialism in a relatable way. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question about socialism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.