JK Rowling

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 31
10/27/2025, 12:56:19 PM
X
In reply to:
Jack Pownall
@JIPTranslation
·
103d
@jk_rowling @garylfrancione What’s more, galileo/galilei even sound like neo pronouns.
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
103d
@garylfrancione 'Yeah, it's true, but you're not allowed to say it.' Galileo would feel right at home with these people.
Prof. Gary Francione
@garylfrancione
·
104d
@jk_rowling "Biologically she's correct but..." There is no "but."
J.K. Rowling
@jk_rowling
·
104d
It is not ‘hate’ to speak the truth.
It is not ‘hate’ to defend the rights of women and girls.
It is not ‘hate’ to be deeply worried about an unevidenced medical experiment on minors.
Rationality goes out of the window when you pretend men can be women.
Concerned Citizen
@BGatesIsaPyscho
·
115d
“She (JK Rowling) believes if you’re born a Man then you can’t ever become a Woman”

“Biologically she’s correct, but, when you introduce this level of hate into a Debate then rationality goes out the Window”

Listen to Labour MP Carolyn Harris make an absolute fool of herself.

The statement 'I go by galileo/figaro' is a lighthearted response in a conversation about pronouns and identity. It appears to play on the idea of using unconventional pronouns, possibly as a humorous or satirical comment. The tone is not directly engaging with the serious aspects of the preceding discussion about gender identity and rights, but rather adds a playful element.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and maintains a light tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more playful than substantive.