Jessica Tarlov
@JessicaTarlov
·
15d
The statement engages in a political discussion about government shutdowns and party responsibilities. It critiques a common argument from the left and emphasizes the importance of truth in political discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to polarization by framing the issue as a partisan conflict.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on critiquing the opposing side rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on pointing out perceived inconsistencies. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.