TGator89
@tg8r89
·
12d
The statement criticizes Wikipedia for being biased and inaccurate, referring to it as a 'dumpster fire.' It also mentions updating a post for clarity, suggesting an attempt to address misunderstandings. The tone is critical and dismissive, focusing on perceived flaws in Wikipedia.
- The statement uses strong language ('dumpster fire') which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the dismissive tone towards Wikipedia could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those who contribute to it. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive feedback. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses Wikipedia without providing specific examples or engaging with differing viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement mentions updating a post for clarity, which aligns with acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.