The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the economic value of higher education and comparing state tuition policies, which are public issues. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat critical, questioning the efficiency of the return on investment for education in different states.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on a factual comparison, adhering to the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by comparing educational returns in different states, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning and comparing, without personal attacks, adhering to the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech responsibly by contributing to a public discussion on education policy, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.