Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a discussion about bipartisan talks and legislative processes, which are public issues. It reflects on the progress of negotiations and the potential timeline for continuing resolutions, indicating engagement in public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to inform about the status of bipartisan talks, which can promote understanding among the public, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on the process and status of talks, adhering to constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement responsibly uses the platform to inform the public about legislative processes, upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.