-4
Anastasios Kamoutsas
@StasiKamoutsas
·
15h
The statement and accompanying image involve a public issue related to educational policy and the enforcement of state statutes regarding instructional content. The tone is assertive and disciplinary, focusing on the removal of a professor for allegedly violating state law by promoting 'gender ideology.'
- The statement takes a strong stance on adhering to state law, which could be seen as upholding the principle of doing no harm by enforcing legal standards. However, it may also harm academic freedom and diversity of thought. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement publicly names and shames the professor, potentially violating their privacy and dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism but rather takes immediate punitive action without public discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to enforce state policy, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment according to the state's perspective, but it may not align with broader societal values of inclusivity and academic freedom. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.