Reposted by Ron DeSantis
-2
The statement questions the logic behind not verifying citizenship for voting, in response to a legal decision preventing the requirement of citizenship proof on voter registration forms. It engages with public discourse by addressing the intersection of voting rights, citizenship, and legal rulings.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it could be interpreted as questioning the integrity of the voting process, which might indirectly cause concern or distrust.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a critique of a legal decision rather than an attack on individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on questioning the logic of a legal decision. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques a policy decision rather than individuals.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning a legal decision, but it could be more responsible by providing context or suggesting solutions. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.