In reply to:
Zan Eskelson
@Zan_Eskelson
·
1d
The statement engages in a political debate about the government shutdown, attributing blame to Senate Democrats and criticizing the narrative around funding for undocumented immigrants. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, using strong language to refute claims made by others.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in hate speech but uses dismissive language that may not fully respect the dignity of others involved in the discussion. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses dismissive language, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.