The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of cancel culture and its impact on democracy. It suggests that de-platforming is harmful to democratic principles and emphasizes the importance of dialogue over cancellation. The tone is somewhat defensive and critical of those who support canceling public figures like Tucker Carlson.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies that cancel culture is harmful to democracy.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the associated conversation includes aggressive language. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by advocating against de-platforming and encouraging dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue about disagreements but is associated with a conversation that includes personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by opposing cancel culture and advocating for open dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.