The statement expresses a strong opinion on the requirement of proof of citizenship for voting, suggesting it is 'crazy' not to have such a requirement. This engages with public discourse on voting rights and election integrity.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses strong language that could polarize the discussion. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses opposing views as 'crazy.' [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and dismisses opposing views without discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.