In reply to:
The statement critiques the cost-plus contracting system in aerospace, suggesting it incentivizes higher costs. It acknowledges the skills of engineers at Boeing and Lockheed, indicating a focus on systemic issues rather than individual capabilities.
- The statement aims to address systemic inefficiencies, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for more efficient practices. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By recognizing the talent of engineers, it promotes understanding and respect, though it could further emphasize empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the contracting system without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.