In reply to:
Wilted
@Wilted__
·
2d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
2d
The statement by @Wilted__ engages in a public discourse about the expectation of journalists to express opinions on controversial topics, specifically regarding criticism of governments. The tone is defensive and suggests a perceived hypocrisy in the expectation of expressing opinions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a criticism of perceived hypocrisy, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is defensive and dismissive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the request for an opinion without addressing the underlying issue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by asserting the right to refrain from expressing an opinion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.