The statement engages in public discourse by addressing energy policy and the role of subsidies in the solar industry. It suggests that solar energy should compete without subsidies, implying a belief in market competition. The tone is assertive, aiming to counter the idea that removing subsidies is harmful to solar energy.
- The statement does not use harmful language and presents an opinion on energy policy. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes a perspective on energy competition, though it does not explicitly foster empathy or understanding.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue by responding to a previous comment, but it does not attack individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.